top of page

💸Liberty Mutual to Refund $7.7 Million in Consent Order: What Minnesota Policyholders Need to Know

In a recent turn of events, the Minnesota Department of Commerce and Liberty Mutual, one of the giants in the insurance industry, have come to a consensus that will see policyholders benefiting from a massive refund.

Let's break down the key details of this consent order and what it means for consumers.

Disclaimer: This summary article is based on available information and is meant for informational purposes only. It is always advisable to consult official documents or seek professional advice for comprehensive insights.


The Minnesota Department of Commerce initiated an investigation into Liberty Mutual and several of its subsidiaries operating in Minnesota. The findings of the investigation revealed several alleged violations of state insurance regulations. Consequently, a consent order was agreed upon, without the insurance company admitting to any wrongdoing.

The Companies in Question

The proceedings focused on the following companies:

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

  2. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company

  3. Liberty Mutual General Insurance Company

  4. LM Insurance Corporation

  5. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana

Key Violations Highlighted

  1. Antitheft Protection Device Discount: It was alleged that Liberty Mutual did not provide the requisite discounts for antitheft protection devices related to auto insurance. This oversight led to refunds and credits worth over $2.27 million to 53,604 policyholders, averaging about $42.41 per individual.

  2. Discrimination based on Residential Status: The company allegedly considered an applicant's status as a residential tenant when offering multi-policy discounts, especially when bundling auto and homeowners' insurance. This resulted in an estimated $2.7 million in refunds and credits to 7,700 policyholders, averaging $350.65 each.

  3. Automated Rate Increase: The insurance company reportedly applied automated rate increases contrary to state laws. As a result, refunds and credits worth about $2.1 million will be issued to approximately 11,800 current policyholders (averaging $177.96 each) and $670,000 to 8,700 former policyholders (averaging $77.01 each).

Screenshot of the Minnesota Department of Commerce website, 10/25/23

The Outcome

As part of the consent order:

  • Liberty Mutual has agreed to refund approximately $7.7 million to a total of 86,506 policyholders.

  • This refund will be in the form of credits, premium reductions, or direct refunds.

  • An additional civil penalty of $150,000 was imposed on Liberty Mutual. However, this penalty will be stayed (not paid) provided Liberty Mutual adheres to all terms of the consent order.

What This Means for Consumers

For Minnesota policyholders, this action reinforces the commitment of state departments to ensure fairness and transparency in the insurance industry. Consumers are encouraged to be aware of the state-specific rights they are entitled to.

Understanding the Inclusion of Multiple Companies in the Liberty Mutual Consent Order

Liberty Mutual is a household name in the insurance industry, but for those unfamiliar with the inner workings of such large corporations, the inclusion of multiple company names in the recent consent order with the Minnesota Department of Commerce might be a bit puzzling!

Let's delve into why multiple companies were named, even though Liberty Mutual is the primary entity in focus:

1. The Structure of Large Corporations

Large corporations often operate through a complex network of subsidiaries, affiliates, and sister companies. These structures allow companies to manage risk, cater to specific markets, or comply with specific regional regulations. In the case of insurance, different subsidiaries might handle different types of insurance products or serve different geographic areas.

2. Liberty Mutual and its Subsidiaries

For each of the five named companies, while operating under the broader "Liberty Mutual" umbrella, is distinct in terms of its operational focus, regulatory compliance requirements, and business strategies.

3. Regulatory Oversight and Compliance

When a state regulatory body, like the Minnesota Department of Commerce, conducts investigations or takes actions, they need to specify which legal entities are involved.

If a violation occurred in a product or policy managed by a subsidiary, it's essential to name that subsidiary to ensure clarity and legal precision.

4. Implications

Each subsidiary or affiliate is its own entity, with its own tax IDs, insurance licenses, and corporate responsibilities.

If a subsidiary violates a regulation, it's that specific entity (and not necessarily the parent company) that might face penalties, even if the parent company ends up paying those penalties.

5. Branding vs. Operation

To the general public, they might only see a main trade name as the brand offering their insurance policy. However, behind the scenes, the specific terms of their policy, the rates they're offered, and the regulatory compliance behind that policy might be managed by a subsidiary.

The naming of multiple companies in such orders underscores the complexity of large corporations and the regulatory landscape they navigate. With each state having its own regulations, managing these can get complex!

It's a testament to the thoroughness of regulatory bodies in ensuring that every entity, regardless of its relationship with a parent company, remains compliant with the law.

For consumers, it's a reminder that the brand name they're familiar with might represent a web of interconnected companies working together to provide their services.

Closing Thoughts

Such events underline the significance of regulatory oversight to ensure that both consumers and providers benefit from a transparent and fair system!

For a more detailed look into the Minnesota Department of Commerce consent order, click here.

215 views0 comments

Bình luận

Coffee and couch


What NEXT?

bottom of page